Yes, I have, and it was a complete waste of my time.

You could make it into a drinking game. Every time Aquinas makes a logically fallacious statement, drink. It would be a very fast game. You'd be blackout drunk within the first 10 pages.

The entire book is an exercise in circular reasoning, sprinkled with appeals to ignorance, appeals to authority, false dilemmas, and other fallacies. It would be more difficult to name a fallacy that Aquinas didn’t commit than to list the ones he did use.

Clever word games are not a substitute for empirical evidence. Without tangible evidence, every ‘proof’ of the supernatural is a house of cards built on thin air.

You can not prove anything without evidence. Assertions made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.