Profile photo for Nathan Coppedge

(by Oct 17, 2018)

You might see results in complex systems. For example, it might have something to do with the chirality (handedness) of the formation of the heart, and other centralized and slightly decentralized organs.

A deduction on the Zeeman effect would indicate that the brain’s original purpose was to regulate the heart, and similar theories, at both simple and complex levels.

You might apply this to many other examples:

Step 1: Centralized and slightly decentralized blobs appear at the poles.

Step 2: Pick something complex. ‘Organs’ appear in centralized and slightly decentralized locations in a dependent structure with larger organizations (depending on the type of structure as per centralization).

Step 3: The second things to appear, if they appear for a reason, occur as a result of the earlier things (such as organs). Thus, centralized things are a result of a central process, and secondary things are a result of a secondary process, or the Zeeman effect is broken. Generally the primary process is harder to destroy. Also, what is meant by ‘central’ and ‘slightly decentralized’ is described by the Zeeman effect. If the entire organism is already slightly decentralized (say, from a planet) this can explain further decentralized features. Likewise, centralization of some kind explains centralized features, and the preference of centralized or decentraluzed explains the relation of centralized and decentralized.

Step 4: These theories apply from the simplest things to the most complex. So the big lemma is simply nature itself.

It’s a little bit like a transparent genome, or the psychological situationism theory. Hard to grasp, but definitely worth some thought.

Brain version: Magical Brains

See also: BIOLOGY LINKS

View 2 other answers to this question
About · Careers · Privacy · Terms · Contact · Languages · Your Ad Choices · Press ·
© Quora, Inc. 2025