Gee who has the time?

After spending our days corrupting American Youth through subliminal messaging in Rock and Roll lyrics:

Holding D&D parties to convert people into Satanism:

Washing our long Communist hair:

Convincing Women to wear pants:

Thinking women should be allowed to vote:

Practicing dark magic and signing pacts with the devil:

Organizing packs of teenage girls to rape young men and vandalize schools:

And of course, the orgies, followed by a nice pot-luck dinner.

After a busy day like that, it’s nice to unwind showing how much of a clown the former guy was:

Hate is popular now days

You are teaching everyone.

He, simply put, is the most corrupt POTUS in the history of the USA. He has told the most lies of any POTUS. He has had more sexual indiscretions than Bill Clinton. He lacks common sense and acts like a toddler. This is in addition to the fact has committed treasonous acts and practiced blatant nepotism with his appointees completely disregarding their lack of ability to do the job.

He fires people when they disagree with him…he obviously thinks he’s still running his show “The Apprentice.” He has mocked the disabled. He has discriminated in real estate dealings.

He moved the U.S. Embassy causing more dissension in the Middle East. He repeals everything former President Obama put in place simply because he is trying to be the alpha male. He has denigrated immigrants. He has alienated our foreign allies.He has declared war on the press. He has declared war on the poor by cutting social service programs in his budget. His plan for a military parade costs millions that could feed the homeless veterans of this country. In fact I could go on and on but it gets tiring after awhile.

That’s why we have zero respect. It’s not that “our side” lost. John McCain would have been the best Republican president…not the fool in the White House.

He is a poor excuse for a human being let alone POTUS.

I used to be a Republican and have switched parties, not because I’ve fallen in love with ultra-liberal ideology, but because the emerging Republican party is a threat to this nation. I hate Trump and sons to my very core, not because they espouse things like reversing immigration or promoting America first laws that encourage American manufacturing, I hate them because they are painfully stoooopid people who have been elevated to the level of messiah by an undereducated and angry base. We’re talking prewar Germany in the 1930’s, here folks. Though slightly more evil, Hitler was a Rhodes scholar in comparison to the Orange Clown. Either case, what moron runs around making national security decisions by believing he is smarter than the experts? What the fools in the Republican party fail to realize is this rapid escalation of rightwing animosity either ends in a civil war resulting in two much weaker countries and/or the end of democracy throughout the world. Are these the goals and principles of the party of Lincoln? Plain and simple, thoughtful conservatism has been hijacked by an Australian muckraker/billionaire whose only true goal is to make billions more by stirring the pot of mindless conspiracies and distrust of “the other side”! Remember the good ol’days where boring compromise made us the strongest and wealthiest country on the planet, back when we had an eye on the future and were moving forward? Now we are at each others’ collective throats spurred on by people (the ultra rich) who employ public opinion to keep the status quo. I don’t hate my buddy ranchers or conservative neighbors, but they’re the ones I will have to battle with when the blood starts flying, not the puppeteers who orchestrated the division in the first place. Trump, if not for his obnoxious self-promotion as a genius billionaire who got his start from a “small loan” of a million dollars from his father (actually $50 million in combined loans adjusted for inflation), would not be capable of running a hot dog cart. Despite having more than ample opportunity to educate himself in the highest halls of education, instead chose the lifestyle of some fratboy jetsetting international playboy who sees and promotes his own daughter as a fine piece of ass. Quite the posterboy for radical religionists, eh? I fail to see how anyone living in a trailer could possibly see the Orange Turd for anything other than what he is. A fraud who trades on his father’s name, who has the moral sensibilities of a drug addled prostitute, who can’t find an American woman willing or worthy of marrying him, who is a scholastic failure despite his advantages and super-duper, some people would say, intelligence (for passing a cognitive test, really?), who plays to and echoes the worst of his worshippers, who called for the assasination of his political opponents, who gutted environmental and trade laws to benefit himself and his cadre of low-life buddies, who benefited monetarily directly using his office, who openly called for Russian interference in our elections, who incited an insurrection that resulted in the murder of a capitol policeman (law and order party, my ass). Note how many of these “accomplishments” are out and out felonies. Speaking of felonies, I cringe at the thought that this idiot had enough forethought that he could delay earlier felony prosectutions against him by actually becoming the POTUS by rallying the anger of the shirtless beer guts, like some horrific game show or sitcom, and it worked! My question to anyone is what can you not hate about this bloated narcissistic meglomaniac? I hated him long before he got into politics, I hated him as a candidate, I hated him as President, I hate him as an ex-president, and God willing, after his ten thousandth filet-o-fish kills him, I will have my opportunity to fill his coffin with human excrement.

Because rabid skunks shouldn't be ignored.

I think that we spend very little time hating anything. Hate is more a right wing Christian thing.

What we object to is that Trump is wholly unsuited to being President. That has been clear since the campaign. The right wants to believe something else so they tell themselves a story about this being about hate because they need to actively avoid the facts.

Here are some facts for you.

The coronavirus is the first nationwide emergency on Trump’s watch. The Trump administration failed in job one with the coronavirus which was to get testing produced and distributed in large numbers as quickly as possible.

Countries who took this approach and went all out have a death rate of less than 10 per 1 million population. The U.S. did not do this. The death rate in the U.S. is more than 120 per 1 million population and rising.

If the U.S. had taken an aggressive stance and succeeded in rolling out testing in a timely manner the death toll would have been much lower.

Currently we have had more than 40,000 deaths.

If testing had been rolled out efficiently and there has been a strong public health response in conjunction with having the proper tools the death toll would have been under 3,000.

That is 37,000 deaths directly attributable to the incompetence of the current administration.

That is not hate. Those are the facts. You can lie to yourselves all you want. The facts will not go away or change just because you don;t want to believe them.

Because he's a con, a criminal, a fraud, a racist, and a misogynist and rapist who cheated hundreds, maybe thousands of workers out of their wages with his multiple bankrupties, oversaw the largest loss of life in the world during the covid pandemic because he saw the chance to use it for a culture war, caused a huge spike in hate crimes, fawns over foreign dictators, weakened our alliances, tried block the peaceful transfer of power, stole government secrets, weaponised the DOJ, made our country such a joke that the entire UN General Assembly laughed him offstage, exploded the National Debt, cause widespread loss of faith in our system of voting, emboldens the very worst elements of our population…oh, and tried to overthrow the government to remain in power after we fired his fat, greedy ass.

What…you didn't get the email?

Noone has to meet the man. One only has to see everything Trump does and says, since he can’t keep his mouth shut and displays his ineptitude and deranged hatred for the whole world to see.

A false premise underlies the question. The questioner mistakes deep revulsion and a nation-wide sense of embarrassment for “irrational hatred.”

There is nothing irrational about being repelled by a sleazy conman who boasts about sexually assaulting women. And hearing a grown man, born to a vast fortune, whine incessantly about his mistreatment is certainly tiresome and provokes mockery – some of which can be a bit sharp.

For the most part, however, liberals, independents, and Republicans who retain a sense of decency just want Trump placed in an institution where he can no longer degrade and embarrass the country.

That’s not hatred. It’s patriotism.

You’re applying traits of certain schools of classical liberalism to modern liberalism. “Liberal”, in the political sense, does not imply the all of the same qualities of “liberal” in the non-political sense. There is certainly some overlap - both political liberalism and its non-political homonym imply freedom from restraints. But other than that, they can be quite different in their definitions. “Liberals” also isn’t an accurate catch-all for supporters of all the different branches of liberal political theory. However, they do have some common ideas: equality, liberty, individual rights, collective good, etc.

Modern “liberals” tend to fall under the umbrella of “social liberalism”, which emphasizes equality, civil rights, and the expansion of liberties to all. Trump’s actions, rhetoric, and official positions on policy threaten the expansion of civil rights, limit liberties, and do not bode well for the goal of equality. One cannot expect social liberals to lay down and accept the administration of policies that actively work against their ideals, especially when the majority of voters did not vote for him.

It is often hard to see the other guy’s point of view. So, in terms that conservatives might find easier to relate to, imagine this is the situation you are being asked to accept:

Hillary Clinton loses the popular vote, but due to the electoral college, becomes President. Bill decides that he would rather avoid living with his wife and wants to be as far away from her as possible. This choice is unexplained, but the security costs US taxpayer an additional $120,000 a day.

Hillary herself makes two immediate choices. First, she appoints as National Security adviser a man who has extensive monetary links to Russia, and is also quietly being paid by Turkey to advance their interests. This National Security adviser lies, lies and lies again about these links, until he is caught out. This is all exposed by hard work in the media, and as the pressure builds, he is finally fired. Clinton expresses regret about this and sends him texts telling him to “Stay strong”.

Second, Hillary immediately appoints Chelsea as her special adviser. Chelsea accompanies her mother on trips, sits in on meetings with foreign leaders and deputises for her in meetings, while promoting her perfume range via the White House spokesman. Her husband, Marc Mezinsky is brought in to the Clinton administration and given a central role: amongst many other things, he is put in charge of sorting out the Middle East. Despite his zero policy experience, he quickly becomes one of the most powerful figures in the Clinton administration. His construction businesses explicitly reference his contacts with the White House as they pitch for business around the world.

The Democratic Party say all this is fine, and defend Hillary.

A few months into the administration, Chelsea is found to have taken meetings with Russian intelligence operatives, brokered by a shady character who promised her damaging information on Trump, saying:

This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Secretary Clinton - helped along by Aras and Emin.

Chelsea immediately replies, not in the least questioning that there is a larger programme of Russian government support for her mother, but saying:

Thanks Rob I appreciate that. I am on the road at the moment but perhaps I just speak to Emin first. Seems we have some time and if it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer. Could we do a call first thing next week when I am back?

Best,

Chelsea

On the point of being exposed by the New York Times, Chelsea releases the emails and claim that they show nothing untoward at all.

Despite Chelsea herself releasing the emails and admitting that the meeting really did take place, Hillary supporters are able to isolate themselves from reality — a week later, polling finds that 45% of Hillary voters did not believe that Chelsea had taken part in any such meeting.

The Democratic party say that all this is fine, defend Chelsea and say Hillary probably didn’t know about it.

Meanwhile, Hillary reveals code-word information to the Russian ambassador, without permission from the country who supplied the intelligence. Despite the resulting diplomatic storm, she shrugs this off, claiming that since she is President she entitled to tell the Russians whatever she likes.

Hillary quickly takes to insulting foreign leaders and making up policy live on Twitter. She plays golf every weekend on her own courses, while her major policies are blocked by the courts and others fail despite having a Democratic majority in both Houses. She lets guests at her resort photograph her being briefed on security matters. One day she claims that George W. Bush bugged her phones. Her staff defends her comments as reasonable, and claims that their microwave ovens are listening to them.

The Democratic party say all this is fine, and defend Hillary.

Meanwhile, Hillary’s emails are still causing her trouble, so she holds a meeting with the head of the FBI. She asks others in the room to leave before requesting that he shut down the investigation. He refuses and writes up what he has been asked to do. Hillary fires him. She says that this is because he is not doing a good job, and has nothing to do with any investigation.

The Democratic Party remain absolutely fine with all this, defend Hillary, and attack the media for reporting on any of this.

Meanwhile these same Democrats repeatedly fail to get any bills passed in a House and Senate they control, due entirely to their own political incompetence. They attack the media for reporting this too.

We haven’t covered a tenth of it. But try to imagine that situation. Try to taste it. Blatant nepotism; a poisonous mix of stupidity, corruption and shameless self-interest, eating away at America’s civil society, supported and cheered on by one of the major parties. If you love and respect American values, the taste may be physical: it’ll bring bile into your mouth.

That is why liberals hate Trump so much.

Afraid of this??? LMAO

Why does being opposed to, or even hating, a politician somehow imply some sort of superiority over that politician and his supporters? This idea is apparently a theme with a life of its own free of any justification or factual basis, repeated regularly and expressed in a variety of ways, among Trumpoid Republicans, that liberals and Democrats who despise Trump are elitists or simply feel they are better than those who support Trump.

Despite this we hear the relentless hatred and contempt directed at Obama, Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party that comes from Republicans without a note of respect for our views. So maybe we should be asking Republicans, why do you think Democrats are beneath YOU? And do you recognize your own hypocrisy?

That said, Trump is certainly beneath the standards that any American should expect in our president. And that is the point: he isn’t good enough to be president and that has nothing to do with how I see myself in comparison to him or any Trump supporter. He lacks the experience, knowledge and demeanor appropriate for the office.

Ah yeah a Chkn sht poser with a cult of sycophants is really threatening.

I am not certain that it is something restricted to liberals. There are some conservatives that feel that way also.

I think intelligent people are wary of Donald Trump, because the man is a common criminal. He is to be sentenced on 34 felony convictions, he still faces 57 indictments across three jurisdictions and has been named an unindicted co-conspirator in several other matters. He has been sued for half a billion for being a defrauding, defaming, pussy-grabbing pervert.

The idea of a person like that, sitting in the White House is rather scary. Even scarier than having Trump as Commander-in-Chief, is the idea that a large part of the electorate is so lacking in sensible judgement, that it could elect a repugnant orange slug like this, to public office. That really is quite frightening. I doubt there is another nation in the world, that is underpinned by democratic principles, that could possibly elect this inept orange oaf to public office.

Buyer's remorse will set in, shortly after Trump imposes those tariffs he keeps telling everybody that China is going to pay. People will quickly learn about that at the checkout - (and it won't be China doing the paying).